Please register the attached report and email below as an application to discharge conditions on planning permission 2009/1943/P.

 

I have already advised them that a fee of £85 is required.

 

Thanks

 

 

Dear Max

 

I write to ask you to formally discharge conditions 2 and 3 of the above application in accordance with the decision letter dated 3

July 2009. 

 

For your information I enclose another copy of our noise report which contains the information required in order to discharge the conditions.  

 

If you require any further information or wish to discuss please contact me.  My mobile number is 07970 403323.  

 

Regards

 

Louise Spalding

Defence Estates

 

  

 

From: Smith, Max [mailto:Max.Smith@Camden.gov.uk]
Sent: 29 July 2009 18:48
To: DE Ops South-LMS13e (Spalding Louise Ms)
Subject: RE: St Georges Court 2 - 12 Bloomsbury Way London WC1H 8BB, Planning consultation 2009/1943/P

Louise

 

The decision notice has been posted online at

 

http://planningonline.camden.gov.uk/MULTIWAM/showCaseFile.do?appType=Planning&appNumber=2009%2F1943%2FP

 

Regards

 

 

Dear Max

 

I have not yet received the decision notice on the above planning application.  We are keen to get the noise condition discharged.  Could you please fax the decision letter to Peter Allan, so that I can formally ask you to discharge the relevant condition.  I will attach another copy of the noise report with the letter.  

 

Our fax number is 0207 305 4175.  

 

Regards

 

 

Louise Spalding

07970 403323 

 

   

 

From: Smith, Max [mailto:Max.Smith@Camden.gov.uk]
Sent: 27 July 2009 15:58
To: DE Ops South-LMS13e (Spalding Louise Ms)
Subject: RE: St Georges Court 2 - 12 Bloomsbury Way London WC1H 8BB, Planning consultation 2009/1943/P

Louise

 

I’m sorry to hear that.

 

According to our records, the letter was sent on the 3^rd July. However, we have been afflicted by postal strikes lately. I will arrange for a copy to be sent.

 

Regards

 

 

Dear Max

 

Further to your e-mail of 6 July, I have not yet received the decision notice.  I assume it is on its way.  Perhaps you could let me know when I might receive it.  

 

Regards

 

Louise Spalding

07970 403323   

 

From: Smith, Max [mailto:Max.Smith@Camden.gov.uk]
Sent: 06 July 2009 10:47
To: DE Ops South-LMS13e (Spalding Louise Ms)
Subject: RE: St Georges Court 2 - 12 Bloomsbury Way London WC1H 8BB, Planning consultation 2009/1943/P

Louise

 

Planning permission with an appropriate condition has now been granted. The decision notice is on its way to you.

 

Regards

 

 

 

Max

 

I have spoken to John Anani this morning who has, I understand agreed with you that he will recommend to you to condition the application's approval.  

 

Further I understand that you will now be approving the application with this condition.  

 

I would be grateful if you could confirm this and I look forward to hearing from you.

 

I have already told you that the sound recording is going ahead this weekend in accordance with John's requirements and I expect to get the report to you and John on Tuesday of next week.     

 

Please contact me if you require any further clarification.  

 

Regards

 

 

Louise Spalding

07970 403323

 

 

   

 

From: Smith, Max [mailto:Max.Smith@Camden.gov.uk]
Sent: 09 June 2009 16:12
To: DE Ops South-LMS13e (Spalding Louise Ms)
Subject: FW: St Georges Court 2 - 12 Bloomsbury Way London WC1H 8BB, Planning consultation 2009/1943/P

Dear Louise

Our Environmental Health Officer noted the following:

 

2.      The noise level measured on the roof at midday in October 2008 was 49dBA. This implies that a Chiller was running when the background noise level was measured.

3.      In another document titled “The replacement of chillers in St Georges Court” states that the new Chiller’s sound output is 3dB less at 10m. The technical data for the new plant states that the sound output of 73dBA at 1m. This is equivalent to 53dBA at 10m and 4dB more than the level of noise on the roof.

The following is therefore requested:

1. Submission of a full acoustic report.

2.      The acoustic report shall include measured background noise with all existing items of plant on the roof switched off.

3.      The acoustic report shall demonstrate theoretically, with spreadsheet calculations, that Camden’s planning noise conditions would be met at the nearest resident.

4.      The nearest resident shall be indentified in the acoustic report with a location map.

I would be grateful if you provide this information within 14 days of this email, otherwise the application will be determined on it's current merits.

Regards

Max…

Max Smith
Senior Planning Officer
Development Control
Planning Services
London Borough of Camden
Tel: 020 7974 5114
Fax: 020 7974 1680
www.camden.gov.uk/planning

Culture & Environment Directorate
Town Hall Extension
Argyle Street
London
WC1H 8ND

This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this message but are not the intended recipient you are expressly notified that any copying or dissemination of this message without our permission is prohibited. You must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of the Council.

 

______________________________________________
From:   Anani, John 
Sent:   08 June 2009 16:46
To:     Smith, Max
Subject:        St Georges Court 2 - 12 Bloomsbury Way London WC1H 8BB, Planning consultation 2009/1943/P

Dear Max

I refer to the above application for the replacement of two existing Chiller units with two new chillers units on roof of offices (Class B1). Having read through the docs in support of the application, I note the following:

 

2.      The noise level measured on the roof at midday in October 2008 was 49dBA. This implies that a Chiller was running when the background noise level was measured.

3.      In another document titled “The replacement of chillers in St Georges Court” states that the new Chiller’s sound output is 3dB less at 10m. The technical data for the new plant states that the sound output of 73dBA at 1m. This is equivalent to 53dBA at 10m and 4dB more than the level of noise on the roof.

4.      Also that the new plant will be enclosed with acoustic louvres.

 

With this scattered information, I am inclined to request for the following:

1. Submission a full acoustic report.

2.      The acoustic report shall include measured background noise with all existing items of plant on the roof switched off.

3.      The acoustic report shall demonstrate theoretically, with spreadsheet calculations, that Camden’s planning noise conditions would be met at the nearest resident.

4.      The nearest resident shall be indentified in the acoustic report with a location map.

 

Please revert to me with any queries.

Best wishes

John
Dr John Anani
Senior Technical Officer
Compliance & Enforcement Team
Regulatory Services
Culture and Environment Directorate
London Borough of Camden
Town Hall, Argyle Street
London WC1H 8EQ
Tel:   020 7974 2652
Fax:  020 7974 6955
E-mail: john.anani@camden.gov.uk

This e-mail may contain information which is confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright protected. This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer

This e-mail may contain information which is confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright protected. This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer

This e-mail may contain information which is confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright protected. This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer

This e-mail may contain information which is confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright protected. This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer